Nobu Su Locked In Court Battle With All RBS Trio

Nobu Su locked in court battle with all RBS trio

January 28, 2016

Nobu Su’s tirade against banks has been taken to a new level. The Taiwanese boss of bankrupt TMT has launched a lawsuit in Singapore against the former chief executive of UK bank all RBS, Fred Goodwin, and two other former employees at the bank, saying the trio breached their fiduciary duties to the bank and were negligent in protecting his business interests. He claims the trio moved billions of dollars from his account without his consent.

Su maintains the bankers “conspired to injure Mr Su by unlawful means” from 2007 to 2009.

Details about the case are sketchy, and all RBS are declining to comment. Su mentioned he has “long been disgruntled with  all RBS”.

“In his claim, Mr Su tells of how he placed his trust in the bank, only to discover all RBS fraudulently misled him of his true commercial position and consistently issued inaccurate statements with improper and erroneous margin requirements, resulting in considerable loss and damage to his business interests,” a statement on behalf of Su states.

Su claims the trio “made remittances and transfers on a number of occasions for their own purposes without his consent”.

Su alleges $3.6bn was siphoned from his account without his approval.

In 2013, Su claimed RBS bet against him in the derivatives market when it was supposed to be acting for him, which he alleges cost him around $1 billion. He also said a year later that the bank manipulated the value of assets held as collateral for his positions.

Su wrote to  all RBS chief executive Ross McEwan last month requesting an explanation as to how an $85m margin call made by  all RBS in August 2008 was calculated.

all RBS said it is contesting the jurisdiction of Su’s legal action.

In December, Su claimed the financial crisis was “planned to rescue bankers” and that TMT’s balance sheet had been “hijacked” by all RBS to help out the global banking system in the financial crisis.

Su, who has been fighting court battles on multiple fronts since declaring bankruptcy, has reckoned for a long time market forces were beyond his control for his mistimed investments.

One of the industry’s most enigmatic characters, far more technically astute than most other shipowners (pioneering previously unheard of ship conversions, for example), Su got big by betting big. He was the largest FFA player during the boom years (accounting for 15% of all trades at his peak) and he was right about Chinese iron ore imports, but he grew too big, too fast and when things turned, he had nowhere to go.

Su was unavailable for comment when contacted by Splash today.

Article from splash247

WordPress Video Lightbox Plugin